real ,, like yes it is a paraphilia but it is not harmful in any way ,, the comparison to harmful ones is why i dont tell people im objectum cuz like,, euhhhh

objects also just like aren't sentient at all who tf is comparing a liking animals and kids(in a weird way) to being attracted to a object like ok??

wHOS ISEVEN SAYING THIS EVENWHAT

@meowpee @2time >> I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE SAY TS AND HAVE ARGUED OVER IT.... IF YOU CARE SO MUCH ABT OBJECT CONSENT I WANT VIDEO PROOF OF YOU ASKING YOUR TOILET IF ITS OK W BEING FLUSHED.......

have they never heard of like idk bathing??? i'm sure they haven't bcs apparently the bathtub can't consent and that totally matters bcs it's totally a living breathing thing
(hi ok i hopw the makes sense and i don't look weird)

dudeobjects cannot be like affected by getting a littlesmooch the same way a person or creature can itwliterally an object wyy are people stupid +,theres litrally very normalized objects made for touching in weird ways like youwouldnt ask them for consent

@2time @meowpee >> EXACTLY like humans and animals can be traumatized and hurt, an object CANT...... i think its better off if people just say theyre not comfortable with the concept instead of just chocking it up to a morality issue which imo dumbs down other AWFUL paras in a bad way, as if their only issues are consent, which is important!! but theres other factors that make bad ones just That terrible that arent housed in literally just liking objects

irreally do not like when people compare objuctum(especially non ***üal objectum) to pëdofreakia or like zoophillia likethose areNOT THE SAME AT ALL like get a load of this guy

only censoring the first 3 letters is evil.

real...

like i dont need to ask my soda cans if i can kiss it bc ITS AN OBJECT

apparently we cant use underwear bc it cant consent... /silly