GOD DAMN fans myself*

that's one fine digital painting. And an art model stance isn't necessary mature content imo.

This looks amazing! :D

And pretty uh.. hot.. o//.//o

Yeah but if it's an anime character with a big pair of b00bs than it's okay, right?
I don't think nudity equals mature content. I've been doing art at uni for 2 years now and understood that drawing/painting naked models is about connection your visual understanding the the forms of the huma body. It has values, tones, a nicely 'designed' structure. An excellent target of art.
I'm pretty sure a classic greek art figure is well known among kids too, and d*mn it he even got rid of the niples..

Please don't limit his work, art is meant to be the creative act of freedom.

Getting him banned without any warnings or working with the fear of getting banned does. And the work he does are not entirely wrapped around nudity as they might have something else in context.

I'm fine with the point of younger generations may not be the right rarget audience but 1. if that's his interest area, why is he followed by kids who find it disturbing 2. why does the 'mature' law apply to this while it doesn't to many others, just because they illustrate in a style that is more appealing to children thus get away with it.

Have you actually spoke to him regarding how he feels about his work now? If you read the descriprion, it does tell it anyway, it doesn't demand too much analysis. I think other's were disrespective to him by reporting his work without warning him. Don't do that. Ever.
Yes but it's unfair that a rule applies to him and not to others, due to his representational identity. That's the point of rules, being defeated here. Then, what else is left to discuss, may I ask?

I'm not arguing about marking it, I'm arguing against reports without warning for something that isn't as heavy in reportable values. And of course, it's effect on the artist, who is cleary finding it frustrating.